You know you’ve made it to the big time – when you get Mac Attacked

I was somewhat prepared I suppose – Mac users have a reputation for being “passionate” – even a bit nut case-y. I was girding myself for a bit of a backlash when I wrote an article for Ad Age on how easy it is to be slippery with the truth in technology advertising because “heck Judy Consumer won’t know the difference anyway”. The article, for instance, questioned whether Mac’s emphasis on virus free operation was giving “Judy Consumer” a false sense of security.

While I may have prepared, I figured I am not important that anyone would really notice. I was wrong. The Ad Age article did catch the attention of a Mac daily digital daily newsletter, which took exception to my article. Politely, I will restate their point which was they felt that my lack of technological knowledge did not allow me fully appreciate how bullet proof Macs really are.

Got it – they really really disagreed with my point. I respect that.

But then they launched a guerilla attack that was pretty well coordinated to lobb every conceivable personal attack. Many were very funny. Someone took a fair amount of time to create reusable content for others to hurl at me. I was described as an idiot”, worthy only of being in the kitchen, a dishonest reporter (pretty funny since I am not a professional writer), an archetype of silly women everywhere who don’t understand technology. They even pulled the old, tired, “you ignorant slut” why don’t you get some “recreational activities” and stay out of tech. In short, the onslaught was saying – I was worthless as a human being and had no right to even invoke the precious Mac name – much less challenge their sacred reputation.

In many ways, the attack reminded me of a guerilla organization. They come out of the weeds – do their dark deeds and then skulk back into their holes.  The editor deliberately took my article and edited it in such a way to suggest the focus of the article on why Macs can not claim their bullet proof status (that wasn’t the focus at all). They created a bunch of content so users could flood me with a barrage of personal insults that had no intelligence in it. They even accused me of being in the pocket of MS or the security company I quoted in the article.

And just like any guerilla terrorist organization, there is no honor in their fight. There is no desire to keep the conversation focused on the real issue — how real people must grapple with new challenges as we all become more dependent on the Internet.

Nope. The site wanted to whip up a frenzy to drive traffic. They did exactly what my article was complaining about – they played with the facts to satisfy their business needs. There was no straight talk in their harangue.

But I am consoled by the fact that I must have hit big time … otherwise they would not have bothered. I know others have been in this Mac Attack club including a recent article from Fortune’s Philip Elmer-DeWitt in his article; “Why are there no Mac viruses?”
http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2009/09/02/why-are-there-no-mac-viruses. But they seem to reserve their special ire for “ignorant women”…

I thought the days of persuasion by coercion were only reserved for close minded fundamentalists. I was wrong and on this point – I wholly admit my error.

Judy Shapiro

http://twitter.com/judyshapiro

About these ads

3 Responses

  1. Your article did not say anything about “the days of persuasion by coercion were only reserved for close minded fundamentalists.” So I don’t know why you apologize by saying “I was wrong and on this point.”

    What those “close minded fundamentalists”, as you call them, objected to was your claim that Apple is misleading consumers by suggesting the Mac does not suffer from viruses. Either you know this already and are purposefully misleading your readers in which case those who attacked you are right on one point, or you don’t know this and thus should not be making uninformed claims in which case they are right on another.

  2. Just wanted to let you know….I attended DefCon this past month in Las Vegas. DefCon is the hackers convention where anything goes: someone even attempted to bungie jump off the Riviera Hotel where DefCon was being held after picking the lock to the roof. Yet the one thing I recall seeing a lot of in those three days was the presence of MacBooks in numbers beyond what their market share would indicate. DefCon is a place where wireless hacking is occurring nonstop. They even have contests with prizes. So why do hackers seem to prefer Macs in the numbers I saw? I’ll give you one guess….

    As to your being afflicted by the “fundamentalists”, realize that a large number of Mac afficienados are liberals. Ask Sarah Palin how liberals treated her and you might recognize the same treatment.

    Cheers!

  3. very nice, dignified response given the verbal lashing. You took the high road and you come out looking like the smart one. let me add my 2 cents … not all mac fan boys are soo brutish. I think your blog out “smarts” that silly mac daily blog.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 2,193 other followers

%d bloggers like this: